Case 1805381/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Nixon v Hotel Van Dyk Limited t/a Legends Sports Bars — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805381/2020
- Decision date
- 19 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Knowles Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Nixon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a fully remote hearing in Leeds on 16 November 2020, before Employment Judge Knowles, the tribunal corrected the respondent's title to Hotel Van Dyk Limited trading as Legends Sports Bars. The respondent did not appear. The tribunal went on to determine the claimant's monetary claims on the papers before it.
The tribunal found that the claimant's claim of unlawful deduction from wages was well founded and awarded £142.18. It also found that the claimant's claim for unpaid holiday leave on termination of employment was well founded and awarded £824.91.
In addition, the tribunal awarded the claimant two weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because, contrary to the Employment Rights Act 1996, she had not been given an initial statement of particulars of employment. That award was £383.68. The total amount ordered to be paid was £1,350.77.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £142 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday leave on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £825 |
| Other | Award under s38 Employment Act 2002 because the Claimant had not received an initial statement of particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £384 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,351
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s38 Employment Act 2002
- Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.