Case 1805385/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Stones v Thomas Tucker Limited (in administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805385/2019
- Decision date
- 15 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Stones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant, Mrs J Stones, had a claim against Thomas Tucker Limited (in administration) and that the claim was struck out. No substantive determination of the underlying complaint is recorded in the extracted text.
The tribunal noted that by a letter dated 30 April 2020 it gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the tribunal's letter dated 24 October 2020 and/or because the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make any representations and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Davies struck out the claim on 15 May 2020. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not state the underlying cause of action. The GOV.UK listing identifies unlawful deduction from wages, but that is not stated in the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.