Case 1805389/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Terence v Read Dunn Connell Limited trading/as RDC Solicitors Heard: In Leeds — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805389/2020
- Decision date
- 26 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Terence
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mrs N Terence had not proven that she was a disabled person between 1 January and 24 July 2020. That finding meant the Equality Act complaints before the tribunal could not succeed on the facts found.
Her complaints of a failure to make reasonable adjustments, direct discrimination and section 15 discrimination were all dismissed. The judgment records no monetary award and no separate remedy findings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the claimant had not proven she was a disabled person between 1 January and 24 July 2020. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination complaint dismissed because disability was not proven for the relevant period. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Section 15 discrimination complaint dismissed because disability was not proven for the relevant period. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.