Case 1805397/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Martin Jennings v Marcrist International Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805397/2020
- Decision date
- 11 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson Representation
- Venue
- By CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Martin Jennings
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 11 February 2021, Employment Judge Anderson found that Mr Martin Jennings was unfairly dismissed by Marcrist International Limited. The judgment records that the claimant succeeded on the unfair dismissal complaint only.
In assessing remedy, the tribunal found that there was a 75% chance the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event. On that basis, it made a compensatory award of £722.15. The judgment does not record any separate basic award, interest, or other monetary head of loss.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair and awarded a compensatory award of £722.15. The judgment states that there was a 75% chance the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event. | Upheld | — | £722 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £722
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £722
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.