Ms K Almond v Heltcorp Limited — 2022

Case reference: 1805401/2021
Decision date: 14 January 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Moxon Representation
Venue: Leeds via CVP

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms K Almond

Respondent

Heltcorp Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal found that Ms K Almond was an employee of Heltcorp Limited. On that basis, it upheld her claim for an unauthorised deduction from wages arising from the Respondent's failure to pay her in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave when the employment ended. The judgment records the calculation used: an average working week of 38.5 hours at £8.91 per hour, producing £343.04, and a pro-rating of 5.6 weeks' holiday to 1.9 weeks, which gave a gross sum due of £651.78.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal found the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the Claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination. The gross amount due was calculated at £651.78 using an average 38.5 hours per week at £8.91 per hour and a pro-rated holiday entitlement of 1.9 weeks.	Upheld	—	£652
Other	The tribunal ordered additional compensation of £686.08 under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide the Claimant with a written statement of employment particulars.	Upheld	—	£686

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £1,338; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.