Case 1805403/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Daw v St Patrick’s Catholic Club Heard: via CVP in the North East Region — 2024
- Case reference
- 1805403/2023
- Decision date
- 1 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Daw
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Daw’s claim was listed for a final hearing, but the respondent filed no response, played no part in the proceedings, and did not attend either the earlier hearing on 13 December 2023 or the hearing on 1 February 2024. The claimant attended and told the tribunal she had tried to identify the correct legal entity, but had been unable to obtain the names and addresses of the management committee members.
Employment Judge Ayre recorded that St Patrick’s Catholic Club did not appear to be a legal entity and appeared instead to be an unincorporated association, described by the claimant as a private members club run by a management committee. In those circumstances, the tribunal held that it could not issue a judgment ordering St Patrick’s Catholic Club to make a payment to the claimant.
The tribunal therefore found that the claim could go no further and dismissed it. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause(s) of action. The claim was dismissed because the named respondent was said not to exist as a legal entity capable of being ordered to pay the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.