Case 1805408/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ahmad, husband and lay representative v Mr Underwood, consultant — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805408/2022
- Decision date
- 6 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mrs J Hiser, Mr M Brewer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ahmad, husband and lay representative
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds on 30 and 31 October and 1 to 3 November 2023, before Employment Judge Cox with members Mrs J Hiser and Mr M Brewer, the tribunal heard Mrs M Jabeen's claims against EC4 Hotel Limited t/a Cedar Court Hotel. In the liability judgment dated 3 November 2023 and sent on 6 November 2023, allegations 8 and 9 were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
The tribunal recorded that the remaining allegations failed and were dismissed. It also ordered the claimant to pay the respondent £400 in respect of its preparation time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The supplied judgment records that allegations 8 and 9 were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant, and that the remaining allegations failed and were dismissed. The text does not allocate the specific allegations between the pleaded grounds. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The supplied judgment records that allegations 8 and 9 were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant, and that the remaining allegations failed and were dismissed. The text does not allocate the specific allegations between the pleaded grounds. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £400
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.