Case 1805409/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Nash v Horizon Executives Limited (sued as ‘Horizon Executive Limited’) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805409/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Nash
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Horizon Executives Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Ms Nash's wages. First, it found that she worked 44 days between 7 March 2022 and 5 May 2022 at a daily rate of £85, so she was entitled to gross remuneration of £3,740. As she had been paid £2,722.56 and nothing had been paid to HMRC, the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction of £1,017.44.
The tribunal also found that holiday pay remained due when the contract ended. It found that Ms Nash had accrued 4.5 days' holiday entitlement, had taken two days, and therefore had 2.5 days untaken. At £85 per day, the unpaid holiday pay came to £212.50.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £1,229.94 in total by 4 January 2023, comprising the two sums found due for unpaid remuneration and accrued holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages in two parts: non-payment of remuneration for 44 working days between 7 March 2022 and 5 May 2022, and non-payment of accrued holiday pay on termination. It found 44 days at a daily rate of £85 gave gross remuneration of £3,740, of which £2,722.56 had been paid, leaving an unauthorised deduction of £1,017.44. It also found 2.5 days of untaken holiday at £85 per day, amounting to £212.50. | Upheld | — | £1,230 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,230
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.