Case 1805417/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Copsey v Lcc Fm Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805417/2020
- Decision date
- 1 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Knowles Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Copsey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment heard at Leeds on 1 February 2021 before Employment Judge Knowles, with the claimant, Miss C Copsey, appearing in person and no attendance by the respondent, LCC FM Limited. The tribunal determined the claim on the papers and recorded three monetary awards.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,679.54. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £392.30.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £195.14. The total sum awarded under the judgment was £3,266.98.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,680 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £392 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £195 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,267
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.