Case 1805430/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Walker v Fera Science Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805430/2020
- Decision date
- 22 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 January 2022, the Tribunal gave Miss A Walker an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were failure to comply with the order to disclose information by 10 January 2022, failure to reply to the Tribunal’s letters of 17 January 2022 and 28 January 2022, and that the claim had no longer been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Maidment struck out the claim on 22 February 2022. The judgment records no substantive liability findings and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause or causes of action. It records only that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with an order to disclose information by 10 January 2022, failed to reply to the Tribunal’s letters of 17 January 2022 and 28 January 2022, and had not been actively pursuing the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.