Case 1805437/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Redman v Mills Property Group Limited and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 1805437/2019
- Decision date
- 6 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robertson
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs L Redman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 6 December 2019, Regional Employment Judge Robertson recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment does not set out any findings on the substance of the pleaded claims.
No liability findings or remedy awards are recorded. The only outcome in the judgment is procedural disposal after withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no separate substantive finding is recorded for this head. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no separate substantive finding is recorded for this head. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no separate substantive finding is recorded for this head. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no separate substantive finding is recorded for this head. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.