Case 1805473/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Mitchell v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805473/2022
- Decision date
- 15 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Mitchell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's complaint that his dismissal was direct discrimination because of religion or belief. The claimant said his belief was that the Covid vaccine was the mark of the beast and that people should not receive it, relying on his Church's earlier stance and passages from Revelation. Taking the claimant's case at its highest, the tribunal concluded that the belief may amount to a religious belief for Equality Act purposes, so it did not need to decide whether it was a philosophical belief under the Grainger Criteria.
The respondent said the claimant was dismissed for misconduct arising from events in November 2021, and relied on the dismissal letter, dismissal report, appeal notice, and appeal report. The claimant said the respondent's witnesses had previously mocked his beliefs and that restrictions during suspension affected his ability to defend himself.
The tribunal refused strike out because it could not conclude that the complaint had no reasonable prospects of success; evidence would be needed from the claimant and witnesses about whether the witnesses were influenced by his earlier expression of belief. However, it found the complaint had little reasonable prospects of success, noting the time gap between the expression of belief and disciplinary events, that the disciplinary process was triggered by November 2021 incidents, that only one of eight allegations appeared directly related to expression of belief, and that the claimant accepted some of the alleged conduct. A £50 deposit order was made after considering the claimant's means.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | Preliminary judgment on the respondent's application to strike out, or alternatively for a deposit order, in relation to the claimant's religion or belief direct discrimination complaint about dismissal. Strike out was refused, but a £50 deposit order was made because the complaint was found to have little reasonable prospects of success. No final merits outcome was determined. | Other | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Rule 37
- Rule 39
- section 10 Equality Act 2010
- Grainger Criteria
- Van Rensburg v Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames
- Mba v London Borough of Merton
- Forstater v CGD Europe
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.