Case 1805490/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Mycio v Impressive Labels Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805490/2021
- Decision date
- 23 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Mycio
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge Deeley determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal made findings on the papers rather than after a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract without notice or pay in lieu of notice, and awarded £5,750 gross for that loss. It also found a separate breach of contract in relation to the guaranteed minimum dividend payment for the first 12 months of the claimant's employment, and awarded £2,000 gross.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant in lieu of his holiday entitlement on termination of employment, and awarded £986.32 gross for that amount. The total award was £8,736.32 gross, and the hearing listed for 21 December 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract without notice or pay in lieu of notice. | Upheld | — | £5,750 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract in respect of the guaranteed minimum dividend payment for the first 12 months of the claimant's employment. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of his holiday entitlement on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £986 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,736
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.