Case 1805492/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Clarke v North Lincolnshire Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805492/2022
- Decision date
- 24 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
- Venue
- Hull
- Panel members
- Ms Y Fisher, Mr M Taj
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Clarke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Clarke brought claims of direct race discrimination and unfair dismissal against North Lincolnshire Council. The case was heard at Hull on 22, 23 and 24 May 2023 before Employment Judge Miller sitting with Ms Y Fisher and Mr M Taj.
The tribunal dismissed the direct race discrimination claim. It held that those claims were unsuccessful and did not make any award on that basis.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded and was found to be well founded. However, the tribunal also found that the claimant contributed 100% to his dismissal, and for that reason it made no award of compensation. The tribunal did not make an order for reinstatement or re-engagement.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well founded, but recorded that the claimant contributed 100% to his dismissal and made no award of compensation. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.