Case 1805513/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Younis v Harrogate Coach Travel Ltd and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1805513/2019
- Decision date
- 9 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr M Younis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard in Leeds on 9 December 2019 before Employment Judge Maidment. By agreement, the First Respondent was correctly named as Harrogate Coach Travel Ltd and the record was amended accordingly.
The Claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal against both Respondents was struck out because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it, the Claimant not having been employed by the First Respondent for at least two years. The judgment does not record any remedy because the unfair dismissal complaint was not heard on its merits.
The Claimant’s race discrimination complaint against the Second Respondent was dismissed following his withdrawal of that claim. No findings on liability or remedy were made in relation to that complaint.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal complaint because the Claimant had not been employed by the First Respondent for at least two years. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The race discrimination complaint against the Second Respondent was withdrawn by the Claimant and dismissed on that basis. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.