Case 1805522/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Malcolm v Delta Academies Trust — 2018
- Case reference
- 1805522/2018
- Decision date
- 6 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Malcolm
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Leeds on 6 September 2018, before Employment Judge Lancaster, dismissed the claimant's case because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The written record does not set out the underlying factual allegations or any substantive liability findings beyond that summary dismissal.
The claimant also applied to amend the case to add a claim of constructive unfair dismissal based on his resignation on the day of the hearing. That application was refused, and the tribunal recorded that a fresh claim would have to be submitted if that allegation was to be pursued. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and was dismissed. The application to amend to add a claim of constructive unfair dismissal based on the claimant's resignation was refused, with the tribunal stating that a fresh claim would be required if that allegation was pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.