Case 1805534/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Tilburn v Jackson’s Chicken Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805534/2022
- Decision date
- 8 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge James
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Tilburn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that, by a letter dated 25 January 2023, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make any sufficient representations explaining why strike out should not occur, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out.
The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying complaint, and it does not record any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type, but the case listing categories supplied for this case include unfair dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type, but the case listing categories supplied for this case include unlawful deduction from wages. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.