Case 1805538/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Q M Farooq v Mr M Afzal and Others HELD at Sheffield by CVP — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805538/2022
- Decision date
- 11 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Q M Farooq
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Brain on 30 March 2023. The only recorded issue determined by the tribunal was the claimant's application for an order striking out the respondents' response on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
That application was refused. The judgment also records, by consent, that at all material times the claimant was an employee and in employment within the statutory definitions applicable to each of his complaints.
No substantive liability findings were made in this decision, and no remedy was awarded or addressed. The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | At an open preliminary hearing, the claimant's application for an order striking out the respondents' response on the ground that it had not been actively pursued was refused. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.