Case 1805544/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 1805544/2023
- Decision date
- 17 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Hull before Employment Judge JM Wade on 15–16 July 2024, found that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal against the respondent was well founded.
The tribunal made awards comprising a basic award of £2,268.44 and a compensatory award of £7,679.63. The recoupment regulations were stated not to apply to these awards, and the total sum payable was recorded as £9,948.07.
This is a judgment-only document; written reasons were not provided unless requested by the parties within 14 days, so the tribunal's detailed reasoning is not set out in the available text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Award comprises a basic award of £2,268.44 and a compensatory award of £7,679.63, totalling £9,948.07. Recoupment regulations do not apply. | Upheld | — | £9,948 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,948
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,268
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,680
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.