Case 1805546/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Hulley v Arete Property Services — 2019
- Case reference
- 1805546/2018
- Decision date
- 25 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keevash Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Hulley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been filed. On the available material, Employment Judge Keevash determined that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment ordered Arete Property Services to pay the claimant forthwith the gross amount deducted, stated as £360.00. No other claims, findings, or remedy components are recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay the gross amount deducted. | Upheld | — | £360 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £360
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.24 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.