Case 1805575/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Kersey v DYDRM Limited trading as The Printers Apprentice — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805575/2021
- Decision date
- 23 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Kersey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr E Kersey, was employed by DYDRM Limited trading as The Printers Apprentice from 19 February 2020 to 15 October 2021. At the hearing he accepted that his statutory redundancy payment claim failed because he had not completed two years' continuous employment, that his notice pay had already been paid, and that he was not pursuing any separate arrears of pay argument. The tribunal therefore dismissed the redundancy pay claim, the breach of contract claim for notice pay, and the arrears of pay claim.
The remaining dispute was over holiday entitlement and holiday pay on termination. The tribunal found that the claimant had not taken any holiday in the 2020 to 2021 leave year and that he had reached an agreement with Mr Wood in March 2021 allowing all 36 days of that holiday to be carried forward. The tribunal said that agreement had been recorded in writing but had since been lost by the respondent. It also held, alternatively, that 4 weeks of leave could be carried forward under regulation 13(10) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 because, as a result of coronavirus, it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to take that leave.
Between 15 July and 8 October 2021 the respondent required the claimant to take 51 days of holiday. The claimant succeeded only on three days where notice was given on 14, 19 and 22 July 2021, but the tribunal held that the notice requirements in regulation 15(2) were varied or excluded by clause 16 of the contract under regulation 15(5), so the respondent was entitled to require leave on those dates. The tribunal rejected the claimant's argument that being salaried prevented the respondent from requiring holiday on particular days. On the tribunal's findings, the claimant had 54 days' leave in total, less 51 days taken, leaving 3 days unpaid.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £242.31 for accrued but untaken holiday pay, calculated under clause 17 of the contract at 1/260th of annual salary per day. No separate award for interest, injury to feelings, or other compensation was made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the claimant had not completed two years' continuous employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the claimant had been paid the notice pay to which he was entitled. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the claimant accepted that no arrears of pay were due. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Upheld in respect of 3 days' accrued but untaken holiday pay, calculated at 1/260th of the annual salary of £21,000 per day. | Upheld | — | £242 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £242
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- regulation 13(10) WTR 1998
- regulation 13A WTR 1998
- regulation 14 WTR 1998
- regulation 15(5) WTR 1998
- clause 16 of contract
- clause 17 of contract
- clause 18 of contract
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.