Case 1805590/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms O Andrusenko v The Phoenix Partnership (Leeds) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805590/2021
- Decision date
- 8 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr. M. Taj, Mr. R. Webb
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms O Andrusenko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs O Andrusenko brought a claim against The Phoenix Partnership (Leeds) Ltd alleging indirect disability discrimination. The case was heard at Leeds by CVP video link on 7 and 8 July 2022 before Employment Judge Shepherd sitting with Mr. M. Taj and Mr. R. Webb.
The Tribunal's unanimous judgment was that the claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. The written record does not set out the detailed reasons because the Tribunal gave its reasons orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were to be provided unless requested within 14 days.
No award or other remedy was recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment describes this as a claim of indirect disability discrimination; the taxonomy does not include an 'indirect' subtype, so it is mapped to discrimination_disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.