Case 1805603/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Andrew Bostock Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805603/2021
- Decision date
- 25 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Conley JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mollie-Mae Thomas, brought a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages against Andrew Bostock Ltd. The case was heard at Leeds Employment Tribunal in the Virtual Region on 6 January 2022 before Employment Judge Conley.
The tribunal held that the claim was well founded. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay the claimant the full amount of wages due for the period from 13 September 2021 to 23 September 2021.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £196.02, less deductions for tax and National Insurance, describing that figure as the total gross sum deducted. No separate remedy breakdown beyond that payment was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim well founded and ordered payment of the total gross sum deducted, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £196 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £196
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.