Case 1805610/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Gelder v Whitbread plc HELD by CVP at Leeds — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805610/2022
- Decision date
- 18 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Gelder
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Gelder was employed by Whitbread Plc as a night reception team member at the Premier Inn, Barnsley Central. The tribunal found that on 28 June 2022 a guest complained that someone had entered room 317 at about 1am, and that CCTV and the employer’s records showed the claimant’s key had been used on the relevant night twice, at 00:03 and 00:48. The claimant’s account was that he had been doing a walk round, had tested the lock, and later had been listening for noise, but he had not recorded either incident on the corridor check log. After investigation, suspension, a disciplinary hearing, further investigation, and an appeal, the respondent dismissed him summarily for gross misconduct on 16 July 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 98(1), (2) and (4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Home Stores Ltd v Burchell [1980] ICR 303
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.