Case 1805611/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S James v DN Bars Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1805611/2023
- Decision date
- 31 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S James
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThese claims were issued in the North East Region on 26 September 2023 and 7 November 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge JM Wade made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a contested hearing. The hearing listed for 5 March 2024 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered DN Bars Group Ltd to pay the gross sum of £5,492.34. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,076.23. The judgment records no additional remedy components beyond those two gross sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,492 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,076 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,569
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.