Case 1805620/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Hogan v Peel Hotels Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1805620/2023
- Decision date
- 22 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Hogan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs C Hogan brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Peel Hotels Ltd. The case was heard at Leeds on 15 and 16 August 2024 before Employment Judge Shepherd, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by a litigation consultant.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and succeeded. The judgment states only the outcome and the monetary sums awarded; it does not set out detailed written reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The respondent was ordered to pay £12,163.65 net for loss of earnings and £400 gross for loss of statutory protection. No separate basic award, interest award, or other heads of remedy are identified in the written judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded and ordered payment of loss of earnings of £12,163.65 net and loss of statutory protection of £400 gross. The judgment does not separate the award into basic and compensatory components. | Upheld | — | £12,564 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,564
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £12,564
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.