Case 1805641/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L van Riel v Zhi Solutions Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805641/2020
- Decision date
- 18 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L van Riel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs L van Riel presented claims on 27 September 2020 against Zhi Solutions Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation). The tribunal sent notice of the claim to the respondent on 7 October 2020, and no response was presented. This was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Shepherd on 18 January 2021.
The tribunal recorded that the claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract in relation to notice pay, outstanding holiday pay, failure to provide written reasons for dismissal, redundancy pay, and failure to provide a written pay statement all succeeded. The judgment does not set out separate liability reasoning because it is a short Rule 21 decision and the respondent did not participate.
No remedy figures were assessed in this judgment. The tribunal stated that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled in respect of the successful claims will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim succeeded; remedy was to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Described as breach of contract - notice pay; remedy was to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Described as outstanding holiday pay; remedy was to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide written reasons for dismissal succeeded; no separate remedy figure was determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The redundancy pay claim succeeded; remedy was to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a written pay statement succeeded; no separate remedy figure was determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.