Case 1805658/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Brumbill & Others (see Schedule) v Davymarkham Limited (in administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805658/2018
- Decision date
- 21 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Brumbill & Others (see Schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 21 January 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimants did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Brain struck out the claims. The decision is a procedural outcome only and does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying employment complaints.
The judgment lists the individual claimants covered by the strike-out, including Mr Glyn Brumbill and the other named claimants in the schedule. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type(s) individually; it records only that the claims in the case were struck out for failure to actively pursue them. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.