Case 1805674/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Shaw v South Yorkshire Housing Association — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805674/2020
- Decision date
- 2 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Shaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing on 2 December 2020 before Employment Judge Buckley, the tribunal dealt with Mr Shaw's claim against South Yorkshire Housing Association. The written judgment records that the hearing was conducted by audio and that no face-to-face hearing took place because it was not practicable and the issues could be determined remotely.
The only substantive disposal recorded in the judgment is that the claim for unfair dismissal was struck out. The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons for striking out the claim, noting instead that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states that the unfair dismissal claim was struck out. It also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.