Case 1805680/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Thompson v Thornton Processing Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805680/2020
- Decision date
- 3 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment for Mr G Thompson against Thornton Processing Ltd. The tribunal accepted the claims advanced and made awards for an unauthorised deduction from wages, breach of contract in respect of notice, redundancy pay, and unpaid holiday entitlement.
On wages, the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction and ordered payment of £3,899.51 gross. On notice, it found the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract and ordered damages of £4,842 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,842, recorded as 9 x £538 cap.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £2,603.37, recorded as 15.8 x £167.77. The judgment does not set out any separate liability reasoning beyond the Rule 21 decision and the individual award entries.
The total of the awards recorded in the judgment is £16,186.88 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,899.51. | Upheld | — | £3,900 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages in the gross sum of £4,842. | Upheld | — | £4,842 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,842, described as 9 x £538 cap. | Upheld | — | £4,842 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,603.37, described as 15.8 x £167.77. | Upheld | — | £2,603 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,187
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.