Case 1805685/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr AM Ashu v New Red Planet Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805685/2020
- Decision date
- 4 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Ms J Lancaster, Mr DW Fields
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr AM Ashu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in Leeds by CVP on 2 to 4 June 2021 before Employment Judge Maidment with members Ms J Lancaster and Mr DW Fields, upheld two breach of contract claims brought by Mr AM Ashu against New Red Planet Limited. It found that the respondent had failed to make payments of wages for guaranteed minimum hours and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,283.86. It also upheld the claimant's breach of contract claim in respect of notice and ordered payment of the gross sum of £156.74.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints of whistleblowing detriment, automatic unfair dismissal, and accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. The judgment records those claims as failing and being dismissed, and no separate monetary award was made for them. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment is therefore the sum of the two breach of contract awards, £1,440.60 gross.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim in respect of a failure to make payments of wages for guaranteed minimum hours; tribunal ordered gross sum of £1,283.86. | Upheld | — | £1,284 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim in respect of notice; tribunal ordered gross sum of £156.74. | Upheld | — | £157 |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of whistleblowing detriment dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal complaint dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Complaint in respect of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,441
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.