Case 1805698/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ugur Yaltiligil v Jones Howard Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805698/2020
- Decision date
- 3 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ugur Yaltiligil
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds Employment Tribunal Centre by CVP on 3 February 2021 before Employment Judge Anderson. The respondent did not attend and was not represented. Proceeding under Rule 21, the tribunal dealt with the matter on the papers before it.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages by failing to pay the furlough payments that had been agreed. The claim therefore succeeded as an unlawful deduction from wages claim, and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £2,439.96 net. The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any tax and national insurance payable on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay agreed furlough payments and orders payment of £2,439.96 net. | Upheld | — | £2,440 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,440
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.