Case 1805711/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Barnes Mr C Fisher v Northfield Fabrications Limited HELD by CVP at Leeds — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805711/2022
- Decision date
- 8 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Barnes Mr C Fisher
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal corrected the respondent's name to Northern Fabrications Limited. The respondent did not enter a response, did not appear, and was not represented. The judgment made separate monetary awards to the two claimants and did not set out a wider factual narrative or legal analysis.
Mr Barnes was awarded £520 gross notice pay and £468 gross wages being a week in hand, making £988 in total. Mr Fisher was awarded £456 gross notice pay, £456 gross wages for the week ending 26 August 2022, £456 gross wages for the week ending 2 September 2022, and £638.40 gross holiday pay for 7 days, calculated from an annual gross salary of £23,712 at £91.20 per day. The combined arithmetic total of the sums ordered is £2,994.40.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded to Mr Barnes (£520 gross) and Mr Fisher (£456 gross). | Upheld | — | £976 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Wages awarded to Mr Barnes for a week in hand (£468 gross) and to Mr Fisher for the week ending 26 August 2022 (£456 gross) and the week ending 2 September 2022 (£456 gross). | Upheld | — | £1,380 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay awarded to Mr Fisher for 7 days, calculated from annual gross salary of £23,712 at £91.20 per day. | Upheld | — | £638 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,994
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.