Case 1805719/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J Ibbetson v Odddfellows Hotel Bar & Grill Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805719/2021
- Decision date
- 17 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J Ibbetson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr J Ibbetson, succeeded in his claim for unlawful deductions from wages and his claim for unpaid holiday pay. Employment Judge Buckley recorded that the amount of unpaid wages was £432.90 and the amount of unpaid holiday pay was £594.77. The respondent did not appear at the hearing held by CVP on 17 January 2022.
The tribunal noted that the respondent had already paid the claimant £362. It therefore ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the total outstanding sum of £665.67 in compensation for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. The judgment also states that the recoupment regulations did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deductions (unpaid wages) succeeded; tribunal found unpaid wages of £432.90. | Upheld | — | £433 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay succeeded; tribunal found unpaid holiday pay of £594.77. | Upheld | — | £595 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £666
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £666
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.