Case 1805721/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Mankin v Department for Work and Pensions AT A HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805721/2022
- Decision date
- 7 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- N Pearse, DW Fields
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Mankin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a hearing at Leeds by CVP on 5, 6 and 7 June 2023 before Employment Judge Lancaster, with members N Pearse and DW Fields. The claimant was Miss S Mankin and the respondent was the Department for Work and Pensions. The judgment record states that the claim was dismissed.
No written reasons were provided in the published record, because reasons were given orally at the hearing. The extracted text does not set out the tribunal's factual findings, the legal analysis, or any remedy assessment. The only material outcome recorded is dismissal of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record does not identify the separate factual basis for this claim; it records only that the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written record does not set out the disability discrimination allegations or any separate findings; it records only that the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.