Case 1805723/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Moran v Mr Gary Ata trading as Noble Design & Build AT A HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 1805723/2023
- Decision date
- 1 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Moran
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal, leaving a claim of constructive unfair dismissal. The tribunal proceeded in the claimant's absence after she emailed during the second hearing day to say she would not attend the final part of the hearing and did not seek an adjournment.
The tribunal found that personal issues between the claimant and B had entered the workplace and affected their working relationship, but that the respondent had sought to keep them separate and facilitate the claimant remaining in the business. It found that the later holiday booking issue was careless miscommunication and could in appropriate circumstances be capable of being a last straw, but was not itself a breach of contract.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had genuinely concluded she could no longer continue working for the respondent, particularly because of the personal situation with B. It found, however, that she had not shown conduct by the respondent or its agents which separately or cumulatively amounted to a fundamental or repudiatory breach, and therefore found she was not constructively dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim of failure to pay accrued holiday pay at the date of termination is dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the remaining claim as constructive unfair dismissal under section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp 1978 ICR 221
- Omilaju v Waltham Forest London Borough Council 2005 ICR 481
- rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 62(2) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.