Case 1805729/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Roe v The Trustees of Driffield Community Centre — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805729/2022
- Decision date
- 6 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Roe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a part-time caretaker employed from January 2019, brought a claim for unpaid holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal found that, at least during the first year of employment, he had been told by Mr Rounding and/or Mr Stocker that he was not entitled to holiday pay. Ms Wells denied that this had been said, but she had not been present for the relevant conversations, and the respondent did not produce witness evidence from the people alleged to have given the denial. The respondent also relied on only one example of paid time off, a seven-day trip to Spain, and produced no holiday pay records. It was accepted that Ms Wells began paying holiday pay from 1 February 2022.
Applying Smith v Pimlico Plumbers Limited [2022] EWCA Civ 70, the tribunal held that the claimant had not been specifically and transparently given the opportunity to take paid annual leave, encouraged to take it, and informed that it would be lost at the end of the leave year. On that basis, the leave did not lapse in the usual way and carried over until termination. The parties agreed the calculation if holiday pay was due, and the tribunal awarded £2,105.24, made up of the agreed accrued amounts from January 2019 to 31 January 2022 less £130.18 for the Spanish trip.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The extracted judgment text states that the claimant worked until 2 September 2002, which appears to be a typographical error in the source text. The award was calculated from January 2019 to 31 January 2022, less seven days for the Spanish trip. | Upheld | — | £2,105 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,105
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Regulations 13 to 17 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- Smith v Pimlico Plumbers Limited [2022] EWCA Civ 70
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.