Case 1805732/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Aylmer v Dnata Catering UK Ltd and 4 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 1805732/2023
- Decision date
- 11 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
6 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing on 9 January 2024, the tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew a number of claims and that those claims were struck out. The withdrawn matters included all claims against the fifth respondent and all claims against the third and fourth respondents.
The tribunal struck out, on withdrawal, breach of contract damages claims except for notice pay, written pay statement and unauthorised deduction from wages complaints relating to weeks 4, 5 and 6 of employment, a direct sex discrimination complaint, and specified complaints of whistleblowing detriment and victimisation. The judgment states that there is no continuing claim of sex discrimination.
No remedy or monetary award was addressed in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claims seeking damages for breach of contract were struck out on withdrawal, except for notice pay. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Claims in respect of failure to provide a written pay statement for weeks 4, 5 and 6 of employment were struck out on withdrawal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of weeks 4, 5 and 6 of employment was struck out on withdrawal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The direct sex discrimination complaint identified by reference to paragraph 11 of the claim form and paragraphs 56-58 of the Further Particulars was struck out on withdrawal. The judgment states there is no continuing claim of sex discrimination. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Whistleblowing | Whistleblowing detriment complaints at paragraphs 60(i), (j) and (l) of the Further Particulars were struck out on withdrawal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation complaints pursuant to Section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 at paragraphs 60(i), (j) and (l) of the Further Particulars were struck out on withdrawal. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 27 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.