Case 1805789/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Wrench v Rutherford Vending Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1805789/2024
- Decision date
- 31 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Wrench
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 20 June 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Maidment Date determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the material before the tribunal, the judge found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,917.60 gross. The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,376.40 gross.
The judgment further recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £8,921.22, and that holiday entitlement had not been paid, resulting in an award of £1,458.80 gross. The tribunal additionally found that the respondent had breached an implied term of the claimant's contract by deducting employees' pension contributions from his wages for 12 months but not paying them into his pension, and ordered £511.08. The awards total £18,185.10 gross, and the hearing listed for 8 January 2025 was postponed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,918 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded as damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £4,376 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £8,921 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,459 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of an implied term relating to pension contributions deducted from wages but not paid into the pension. | Upheld | — | £511 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,185
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.