Case 1805793/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Cooper v Abbey Care and Education Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805793/2022
- Decision date
- 2 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Cooper
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that a letter dated 19 January 2023, sent to the parties on 2 February 2023, gave the Claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claim was brought by Ms J Cooper against Abbey Care and Education (In Voluntary Liquidation).
The Claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The short reasons do not set out any findings on the merits of the underlying claim or any remedy.
No monetary award was made, and the judgment does not record any further substantive determination beyond the strike out for non-pursuit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment records that 'the claim' was struck out for want of active pursuit. The underlying claim type is taken from the case listing category rather than from the short reasons, which do not separate the claims. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that 'the claim' was struck out for want of active pursuit. The underlying claim type is taken from the case listing category rather than from the short reasons, which do not separate the claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.