Case 1805796/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H White v Mayfair Residential Care Home Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805796/2022
- Decision date
- 23 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Maidment on 23 December 2022 in respect of claims brought by Mrs H White against Mayfair Residential Care Home Ltd. The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £865.38 (based on a gross weekly pay of £288.46). The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,298.07, and that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, ordering payment of £1,096.14.
The claim of unfair dismissal succeeded. However, the tribunal made no compensatory award, on the basis that the claimant had already been awarded damages in respect of her notice period and giving credit for the amount paid by the respondent. No basic award arose in light of the declaration of entitlement to a redundancy payment. A hearing listed for 14 March 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice, based on gross weekly pay of £288.46. | Upheld | — | £865 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £1,298 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; ordered to pay the gross sum stated. Listed by gov.uk under Working Time Regulations / Unlawful Deduction from Wages; classified here as holiday_pay per §4.4. | Upheld | — | £1,096 |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim of unfair dismissal succeeds but no compensatory award was made (claimant already awarded notice-period damages, with credit given for sums paid by the respondent) and no basic award arises in light of the redundancy payment declaration. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,260
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.