Case 1805810/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Davies v Ravens Trailers Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805810/2021
- Decision date
- 8 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined on the papers under Rule 21 after the respondent did not present a valid response on time. Employment Judge D N Jones proceeded to determine the claim in the claimant's favour without a hearing.
The tribunal found that Ravens Trailers Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £3,420 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £570 damages. A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, with £1,995 awarded for that item.
The total sum payable was £5,985, being the combined total of the three sums awarded under the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £3,420 gross. | Upheld | — | £3,420 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £570 damages. | Upheld | — | £570 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,995. | Upheld | — | £1,995 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,985
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.