Case 1805812/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Khaku v Meadowhead Physiotherapy Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) HELD by CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805812/2020
- Decision date
- 2 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Khaku
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr K Khaku, worked for Meadowhead Physiotherapy Ltd from 9 March 2020 until 27 July 2020 as a physiotherapist on £25,000 per year. He was told on 24 March 2020 that he would be put on furlough, but on 20 April 2020 he was told he was not eligible. The tribunal found that he received no payment between 22 March 2020 and 27 July 2020, although from 3 July 2020 he did some self-employed work for 4 or 5 hours a week while still regarding himself as employed.
The tribunal upheld the unauthorised deduction of wages claim. It found that the relevant daily gross wage was £68.50 and that 128 days of non-payment had occurred, producing an award of £8,768 gross. It also made a declaration under section 24 Employment Rights Act 1996 in respect of the unauthorised deduction claim.
The holiday pay claim was also upheld. The tribunal found that the claimant had accrued 11 days of holiday between 9 March 2020 and 27 July 2020 and had taken none, at a daily rate of £96.15 gross, giving £1,057.65 gross. Although the holiday pay point had not been particularised on the claim form, the tribunal allowed the claim to be amended because the respondent had not entered a response, was in voluntary liquidation, and was not represented.
On notice pay, the tribunal found that the claimant resigned because of the respondent's conduct, that he did nothing to affirm the contract, and that there was a constructive dismissal for this purpose. It therefore held that notice pay was due under the contract in the sum of £2,083.33 gross, giving a grand total award of £11,908.98 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found 128 days of non-payment at £68.50 per day, and made a declaration under section 24 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £8,768 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had accrued 11 days' holiday between 9 March 2020 and 27 July 2020, at £96.15 per day. The claim was not particularised on the claim form, but was allowed to be amended because the respondent did not respond, was in voluntary liquidation, and was not represented. | Upheld | — | £1,058 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant resigned because of the respondent's conduct, did nothing to affirm the contract, and that notice pay for one month was due under the contract. The reasons section refers to this as a constructive dismissal finding in relation to notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,083 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,909
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 24 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.