Case 1805812/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Betteridge v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805812/2022
- Decision date
- 24 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D Betteridge
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant applied on 31 July 2023 for the judgment sent to the parties on 24 July 2023 to be reconsidered, and the application was dealt with by Employment Judge JM Wade in chambers on 1 September 2023. The judge treated the filing as a reconsideration application under Rule 72(1) and recorded that it had been copied to the respondent under Rule 92.
Reconsideration was refused because there were no reasonable prospects of the judgment being revoked or varied. The reasons addressed the claimant's points that the judgment was without merit or insight, that the hearing had not taken the claimant's stated disability into account, and that justice had not been done. The judge also noted that tribunal hearings were not recorded at that time and that no transcript existed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application dated 31 July 2023 for reconsideration of the judgment sent on 24 July 2023; refused under Rule 72(1). | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 72(1)
- Rule 92
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.