Case 1805817/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805817/2020
- Decision date
- 13 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- CVP
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the complaint of breach of contract about removal of the Claimant's lodging allowance was well-founded and succeeded. The respondent and claimant agreed the remedy by consent, and the respondent was ordered to pay £2,528.15.
The tribunal also held that the complaint of unfair (constructive) dismissal was well-founded and succeeded. It ordered a basic award of £2,690 and a compensatory award of £24,602.30. The judgment is brief and records the outcomes and remedy only, without further substantive reasoning in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint about removal of the Claimant's lodging allowance; payment ordered by consent. | Upheld | — | £2,528 |
| Constructive dismissal | Judgment states 'unfair (constructive) dismissal' and orders a basic award plus compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £27,292 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,820
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,690
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £24,602
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.