Case 1805828/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Toplis v Energize Installations Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805828/2021
- Decision date
- 6 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robertson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Toplis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was entered under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal amended the respondent’s name to Energize Installations Limited and cancelled the hearing listed for 18 January 2022.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,722.00 for one month’s wages and £1,153.00 for holiday pay, making a total gross award of £2,875.00.
The claimant’s claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed. No separate redundancy award was made and the judgment records no further reasons beyond that dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award is recorded as £1,722.00 for one month’s wages and £1,153.00 for holiday pay, totalling £2,875.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,875 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,875
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.