Case 1805833/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 1805833/2018 Mr R Hallyburton v Represented by: Ms L Campbell Solicitor Asda Stores Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1805833/2018
- Decision date
- 4 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 1805833/2018 Mr R Hallyburton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr R Hallyburton's claim was withdrawn by the claimant. Employment Judge Murdo A Macleod therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment is dated 1 February 2019 and was entered in the register on 4 February 2019.
The extracted text does not set out any findings on the merits of the underlying complaint, nor does it record any award or remedy. It simply records the procedural outcome of withdrawal and dismissal. The claimant was represented by Ms L Campbell, solicitor, and Asda Stores Limited was represented by Mr R Alexander, solicitor.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment states that 'the claim' was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The judgment does not split the withdrawal/dismissal between individual heads of claim, but the gov.uk listing for this case identifies breach of contract as one of the listed categories. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment states that 'the claim' was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The judgment does not split the withdrawal/dismissal between individual heads of claim, but the gov.uk listing for this case identifies unfair dismissal as one of the listed categories. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.