Case 1805874/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Willie v AKA Electrical Services Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805874/2022
- Decision date
- 8 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
3 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, sole director and 50% shareholder of AKA Electrical Services Ltd, sought redundancy pay and compensatory notice pay from the National Insurance Fund after the company entered creditors' voluntary liquidation. The Secretary of State rejected the application on the basis that he was not an employee of the company within section 230 ERA, and the tribunal treated that as the only issue to decide.
The tribunal found factors pointing towards employment, including mutuality of obligation, personal service, payment described as wages, PAYE deductions, payslips, P60s and pension contributions. It also found, however, that there was no written contract, service agreement, statement of particulars or board memorandum for the claimant, despite other employees having written employment contracts.
On balance, the tribunal concluded that the arrangements were not consistent with a contract of service. It relied on the absence of apparent intention to create an employment contract, the claimant's control over holidays, sickness, discipline and grievance matters, the contrast with other employees, the non-compliance with the National Minimum Wage for the claimant's wages, and the nature and origin of his remuneration through salary and dividends. The claimant was therefore not an employee at the date of insolvency and the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant sought a statutory redundancy payment from the National Insurance Fund, but the tribunal found he was not an employee of the company within section 230 ERA at the date of insolvency. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes a claim for compensatory notice pay from the National Insurance Fund under section 182 ERA. The claimant told the tribunal he did not believe he was owed notice pay because he had obtained new work almost immediately; the claim was dismissed because he was not an employee. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Ready Mixed Concrete test
- irreducible minimum of obligation
- Clark v Clark Constructions Initiatives Ltd
- Secretary of State v Neufeld and Howe
- Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher
- Eaton v Robert Eaton Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.