Case 1805900/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Marshall v Barn Direct Limited This has been a remote hearing, by cloud video platform (V): A hearing in person was not practicable because of the present restrictions due to Covid 19. — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805900/2020
- Decision date
- 23 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remote hearing in Leeds on 18 December 2020, before Employment Judge D N Jones, the tribunal recorded that the redundancy payment and the outstanding holiday pay had been paid. The judgment does not set out any monetary award on those matters, and it does not record a further remedy for them.
The claimant's request for compensation for mental anguish and distress was dismissed because the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to make such an award. The claimant's application for costs was also dismissed. No additional award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the redundancy payment had been paid before the decision, but it does not record a formal order or further disposition on that issue. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the outstanding holiday pay had been paid before the decision, but it does not record a formal order or further disposition on that issue. | Other | — | — |
| Other | The claimant's request for compensation for mental anguish and distress was dismissed because the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to make such an award. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.