Case 1805927/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Steyert v Ravens Trailers Limited AT A HEARING — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805927/2021
- Decision date
- 10 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Steyert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds by CVP on 10 March 2022 before Employment Judge Lancaster. The respondent, Ravens Trailers Limited, did not enter an appearance and did not attend. Judgment was given under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £3,920.40 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £490.05 gross.
A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The tribunal awarded £573.36 gross for that claim, calculated in the judgment as 76/365 x 5.6 weeks at £490.05 per week.
The total sum ordered to be paid was £4,983.81. No separate award structure beyond the three gross sums and the overall total was set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award stated as £3,920.40 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £3,920 |
| Breach of contract | Award stated as £490.05 gross for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £490 |
| Holiday pay | Award stated as £573.36 gross for unpaid holiday entitlement, calculated in the judgment as 76/365 x 5.6 weeks at £490.05 per week. | Upheld | — | £573 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,984
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.